Credit by: Matt Barker
Maintaining relevance and responding rapidly to consumer demand has helped Microsoft, Coca-Cola, McDonald’s and Disney retain their spot in Interbrand’s top 10 after 20 years.
Relevancy and responsiveness are key traits shared by the brands that have retained their place on Interbrand’s list of the top 10 most valuable brands 20 years after the ranking made its debut.
Coca-Cola (1) topped the Best Global Brands valuation list two decades ago, followed by Microsoft (2), IBM (3), Intel (4) and Nokia (5). The ranking back in 2000 was rounded off by General Electric (6), Ford (7), Disney (8), McDonald’s (9) and AT&T (10).
Taking into account changes to the ways we communicate, work, travel and entertain ourselves over the intervening decades, Microsoft (4), Coca-Cola (5), McDonald’s (9) and Disney (10) are the only brands from the 2000 ranking to claim their place on Interbrand’s 2019 top 10.
This year tech dominates the upper rungs of the top 10, with Apple (1), Google (2), Amazon (3) and Microsoft (4) claiming the first four places, followed by Coca-Cola (5), Samsung (6), Toyota (7), Mercedes-Benz (8), McDonald’s (9) and Disney (10).
“Staying at the top is a massive achievement. Brands like Coca-Cola and Disney have remained relevant to their customers and have also remained culturally relevant,” explains Interbrand’s London CEO, Christian Purser.
“The brands that have declined are the ones that failed to respond quickly enough to change. Nokia really missed the move to smartphones. Staying relevant is all about responding to the market and having a lack of imagination will send you down the table.”
Relevance is crucial, but speed is everything, agrees Mike Rocha, global director, brand and business valuation at Interbrand.
“Speed is really vital, these days, it’s almost as important as the actual response itself,” he states. “You have to anticipate customer needs, to adapt to these ever-changing market conditions. But part of the challenge is to keep the customer as the North Star, to understand them. That’s ultimately what drives the relevance.”
The rankings are collated and calculated on the basis of four key internal factors: clarity (what a brand stands for in terms of values, positioning and proposition), commitment (the belief in its importance), governance (measuring the skills and operating model) and responsiveness (the ability to evolve in the face of market changes and challenges).
An interesting takeaway from the 2019 list is Facebook’s tumble from the top 10. While things tend to move quickly in the world of ‘Big Tech’, Rocha believes there could be something deeper going on.
“It might be that we’re seeing a drop in their relevancy, particularly among younger users. There are also increasingly questions around trust and authenticity,” he states.
Luxury brands, by contrast, have been quick to grasp the importance of relevance, taking their lead from the tech start-ups by adding a frisson of disruptiveness to their methods. This year a revitalised Gucci has made the biggest splash. The luxury fashion house increased its brand value over the past year by 23% to claim the 33rd spot on the 2019 list.
“There are winners and losers in the sector, but Gucci has been busily configuring its approach,” says Rocha. “They’ve made the brand culturally relevant, changed the way they use social media and found ways to communicate with a younger audience.”
He points to Gucci’s ‘Shadow Committee’ of advisors and tastemakers aged under 30, who help the brand stay relevant by finding inspiration amongst the fashion house’s customer base.
The Interbrand ra